Stock photography has always been considered the ugly stepchild of commercial photography. Originally stock photos consisted of out-takes from assignmentsthe seconds if you will. The strategy for success for a stock shooter was to get as much content into the collection as possiblenot a methodology for gaining a reputation for quality!
Bringing Quality To Stock
Along came Tony Stone (Tony Stone Imagesnow Getty Images) who changed the approach from how much material is in a collection to how good the material in a collection is. He pared down the number of images keeping only the very best, made lots of dupes of a given image (back then you had to send out transparenciesso with more dupes of a given image that image could be in front of more potential buyers at once), and became enormously successful. My original stock agency was a company call AfterImage. When Stone purchased it the first thing that happened was that they sent virtually all of my material back to me and only kept a handful of images. The second thing that happened was that my sales tripled!
Getty bought Tony Stone Images and began to apply business principles to stock photography. It looked as though stock my finally start to be looked upon with a little more respectthen RF happened. And again, the emphasis shifted to how much material one could get in. In some cases photographers would sell their entire archives for a set price.
The Saturation Of Images In Stock
Now stock photography is saturated with a gazillion photossome of amazing qualityand a huge number of well-executed but repetitive lifestyle and business image. With crowd sourcing and the entry of non-professionals into the market through agencies like Istockphoto, stock is still the ugly stepchild of commercial photographybut not to me.
Creative Freedom
For me, stock is the highest form of commercial photography. It gives the photographer something truly valuablecreative control. As a stock shooter I am able to choose whatever I want to photograph. I get to photograph my subject in whatever way I want to do it. Unlike assignment photography there are no limitsno Art Directors to satisfy (or rely on), no account executives to please, no clients to impose their own perceptions on your work. No limits!
That isnt to say there arent any challengesthere are challenges galore! While there is no client to impose limitationsthere is also no client to bankroll the shoot.
While there are no limits to what you can shootno one else is coming up with ideas for you. While there are no Art Directors to impose their visionsit is up to you to have that vision and be true to it.
The Challenges of Creative Freedom
Creative freedom is something that I think is a core need of every photographer. But along with that freedom comes challenges. Few things require us to use that creative muscles as much as stock. We need to be creative in coming up with what to shoot. We need creativity in virtually every aspect of stock. Creativity in how to arrange access to a difficult subject, creativity in how to shoot without the financial resources of a clientand creative decisions need to be made on where and how to place the work.
As I write this I have a list of a hundred or so images that I want to create for stock. Sometimes it takes me two years for my subconscious mind to finally figure out how to make something work under the budget and access limits that I have. That brings up another great point about stock. There are no arbitrary deadlinesonly the ones I set for myself.
An example of an idea that took time for me to solve the budgetary restrictions onand the need to exercise creativity in how to get the shots, can be found in a series of stock photos I did with elephants as the subject matter. I originally came up with the idea because I wanted to be close to an elephantto be able to touch one and just hang out with it for a while. So I came up with a few elephant ideas. When I found out it would cost me $5,000.00 just to rent one elephant I put the project on the back burner. A year ago I planned a trip to South East Asia. I was going to shoot in Myanmar (Burma) for a couple of weeks. I would be flying to Yangon, Myanmars capital, out of Bangkok. I began to wonder what I could shoot in Thailand as long as I was going to be there anyway. Then it popped into my headelephants! Perhaps it would cost less to rent one there. Yesone elephant cost me $450.00. For a whole day! Well, I got to hang out with, and touch, an elephant. And in the eight months that I have had the resulting images in the market place I have already earned almost $20,000.00 from those images!
Because of stock I have had the opportunity to hang with a lion, a tiger, and an elephantIve had the chance to shoot a baboon in my studio too. Animals, of course, are not the only perks I have been able to enjoy from shooting stock. I spent a week (and made a nice a profit off of) one of the swankiest Penthouses in Buenos Aires, a magnificent casa in Mexico, heck, I have even rented a disco (also in Buenos Aires) and had a crazy fun time shooting what in effect was a private disco party complete with a crowd of dancers, throbbing music, and smoke machines. Cool!
For me stock is the highest form of commercial work. It requires discipline, creativity, and guts (heyit can take real guts to spend large sums of money on a speculative shoot). But as they say on late-night television infomercials; waittheres more! There is the friendship and fun factor. For me, it is a lot more fun shooting stock where there is no outside pressure to perform and no one but myself to answer too. Also, for a number of my shoots I have invited other photographers to join me. For the disco shoot I shot with three other photographers. We all shared in the cost and worked togetherbut each producing our own set of images. A creative way to reduce the expense of our shoot, to spread the production time and labor outand to get to work with some close friends. When was the last time you invited some close photographer friends to shoot with you on an assignment?
Well, there you have it. My view of why stock is actually the highest form of commercial photography. It is all on your shouldersand with the only limits being those you place on yourself. You dont have to add to those gazillion images of business people on cell phonesor laughing couples on the beach. Sure you canbut you can also allow give yourself amazing challenges with rewards that are commensurate.
